Talk:Python package policies: Difference between revisions
(Note discussion from IRC) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
`_py2_depends` and `_py3_depends` are more consistent with the other variable names and preferable to '_py2_deps' and '_py3_deps' in my opinion. | `_py2_depends` and `_py3_depends` are more consistent with the other variable names and preferable to '_py2_deps' and '_py3_deps' in my opinion. | ||
Agreed, but I've removed all of the Python 2 details entirely pending the coming EoL. | |||
--[[User:Ddevault|Ddevault]] ([[User talk:Ddevault|talk]]) 15:10, 24 January 2020 (UTC) | |||
Line 14: | Line 17: | ||
_pyname is much less common than _pkgname although _pkgname is used for many things; would be good to have a clear recommended name | _pyname is much less common than _pkgname although _pkgname is used for many things; would be good to have a clear recommended name | ||
_pyname was per ncopa's suggestion, I don't have a problem with it. | |||
--[[User:Ddevault|Ddevault]] ([[User talk:Ddevault|talk]]) 15:10, 24 January 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:10, 24 January 2020
This page duplicates quite a bit of details which are already present:
- https://wiki.alpinelinux.org/wiki/Package_policies
- https://wiki.alpinelinux.org/wiki/APKBUILD_examples:Python
Instead of creating a new page the existing information should be updated.
`_py2_depends` and `_py3_depends` are more consistent with the other variable names and preferable to '_py2_deps' and '_py3_deps' in my opinion.
Agreed, but I've removed all of the Python 2 details entirely pending the coming EoL. --Ddevault (talk) 15:10, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
_pyname is much less common than _pkgname although _pkgname is used for many things; would be good to have a clear recommended name
_pyname was per ncopa's suggestion, I don't have a problem with it. --Ddevault (talk) 15:10, 24 January 2020 (UTC)