Talk:Intrusion Detection using Snort: Difference between revisions
Alpineuser (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Reverted apparent vandalism by Guest09248. Baby with the bathwater, a user appears to be actively deleting pages without thorough testing or updating of guides. The proper way...") |
m (Reverted blanking of talk page and added commentary.) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Reverted apparent vandalism by Guest09248. Baby with the bathwater, a user appears to be actively deleting pages without thorough testing or updating of guides. The proper way to edit guides is to evaluate and install each program, updating relevant info where necessary, not blanket deletion of all content.[[User:Alpineuser|Alpineuser]] ([[User talk:Alpineuser|talk]]) 06:17, 8 December 2021 (UTC) | Reverted apparent vandalism by Guest09248. Baby with the bathwater, a user appears to be actively deleting pages without thorough testing or updating of guides. The proper way to edit guides is to evaluate and install each program, updating relevant info where necessary, not blanket deletion of all content.[[User:Alpineuser|Alpineuser]] ([[User talk:Alpineuser|talk]]) 06:17, 8 December 2021 (UTC) | ||
:I would like to think that Guest09248's edits are good-intended, but they seem to take any criticism as an attack (see the history for this talk page, for instance). I do hope that in the future they will engage in discussion rather than simply blanking pages with no stated rationale. [[User:Zcrayfish|zcrayfish]] ([[User talk:Zcrayfish|talk]]) 22:48, 8 December 2021 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:48, 8 December 2021
Reverted apparent vandalism by Guest09248. Baby with the bathwater, a user appears to be actively deleting pages without thorough testing or updating of guides. The proper way to edit guides is to evaluate and install each program, updating relevant info where necessary, not blanket deletion of all content.Alpineuser (talk) 06:17, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- I would like to think that Guest09248's edits are good-intended, but they seem to take any criticism as an attack (see the history for this talk page, for instance). I do hope that in the future they will engage in discussion rather than simply blanking pages with no stated rationale. zcrayfish (talk) 22:48, 8 December 2021 (UTC)