Talk:Python package policies: Difference between revisions
(Add suggestion about variable names) |
(Add _pyname pro) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
`_py2_depends` and `_py3_depends` are more consistent with the other variable names and preferable to '_py2_deps' and '_py3_deps' in my opinion. | `_py2_depends` and `_py3_depends` are more consistent with the other variable names and preferable to '_py2_deps' and '_py3_deps' in my opinion. | ||
Agreed, but I've removed all of the Python 2 details entirely pending the coming EoL. | |||
--[[User:Ddevault|Ddevault]] ([[User talk:Ddevault|talk]]) 15:10, 24 January 2020 (UTC) | |||
---- | |||
_pyname is much less common than _pkgname although _pkgname is used for many things; would be good to have a clear recommended name | |||
_pyname was per ncopa's suggestion, I don't have a problem with it. | |||
--[[User:Ddevault|Ddevault]] ([[User talk:Ddevault|talk]]) 15:10, 24 January 2020 (UTC) | |||
my only issue with _pyname is that it is less common; I agree _pkgname is more common and longer term consistency would be good, we had a discussion about it today on IRC; the consensus there is that it is a private variable and the name doesn't matter. --[[User:Keith.maxwell|Keith.maxwell]] ([[User talk:Keith.maxwell|talk]]) 09:25, 12 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
a good argument for _pyname from IRC is that "More descriptive names are preferable, _pkgname doesn't really tell much" [[User:Keith.maxwell|Keith.maxwell]] ([[User talk:Keith.maxwell|talk]]) 09:38, 12 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:39, 12 April 2020
This page duplicates quite a bit of details which are already present:
- https://wiki.alpinelinux.org/wiki/Package_policies
- https://wiki.alpinelinux.org/wiki/APKBUILD_examples:Python
Instead of creating a new page the existing information should be updated.
`_py2_depends` and `_py3_depends` are more consistent with the other variable names and preferable to '_py2_deps' and '_py3_deps' in my opinion.
Agreed, but I've removed all of the Python 2 details entirely pending the coming EoL. --Ddevault (talk) 15:10, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
_pyname is much less common than _pkgname although _pkgname is used for many things; would be good to have a clear recommended name
_pyname was per ncopa's suggestion, I don't have a problem with it. --Ddevault (talk) 15:10, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
my only issue with _pyname is that it is less common; I agree _pkgname is more common and longer term consistency would be good, we had a discussion about it today on IRC; the consensus there is that it is a private variable and the name doesn't matter. --Keith.maxwell (talk) 09:25, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
a good argument for _pyname from IRC is that "More descriptive names are preferable, _pkgname doesn't really tell much" Keith.maxwell (talk) 09:38, 12 April 2020 (UTC)