Package policies: Difference between revisions
m (added a short license section) |
Dubiousjim (talk | contribs) (Category:Development) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* The license of the program should be based on the licenses approved by the [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses Free Software Foundation] or [http://www.opensource.org/licenses/ OSI]. | * The license of the program should be based on the licenses approved by the [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses Free Software Foundation] or [http://www.opensource.org/licenses/ OSI]. | ||
* If you are unsure about the license, please ask in our [[IRC]] channel. | * If you are unsure about the license, please ask in our [[IRC]] channel. | ||
[[Category:Development]] | |||
Revision as of 07:54, 12 March 2012
The Alpine Linux Package Policies describe some of the policies when creating packages.
Package Names
- All package names should be lowercase.
- Development files are placed in subpackages with -dev suffix (i.e uclibc-dev)
- Documentation files are placed in subpackages with -doc suffix (i.e expat-doc)
- Lua modules (not applications) are prefixed with lua-. (i.e lua-posix)
- Perl modules (not applications) are prefixed with perl-. (i.e perl-xml-parser)
- Python modules (not applications) are prefixed with py-. (i.e py-libxml2)
- Kernels and 3rdparty modules should be suffixed with the kernel flavor. (i.e -grsec or -vserver)
Package versions
- Package versions are similar to gentoo.
Licensing
- The license of the program should be based on the licenses approved by the Free Software Foundation or OSI.
- If you are unsure about the license, please ask in our IRC channel.