Talk:Raspberry Pi: Difference between revisions
Kurushiyama (talk | contribs) m (→Persistence: removed leading space) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Persistence == | == Persistence == | ||
Wouldn't it be more reasonable to partition the SD-Card accordingly? That way, you could have FS > 2GB, too. --[[User:Kurushiyama|Kurushiyama]] ([[User talk:Kurushiyama|talk]]) 10:53, 8 October 2016 (UTC) | Wouldn't it be more reasonable to partition the SD-Card accordingly? That way, you could have FS > 2GB, too. --[[User:Kurushiyama|Kurushiyama]] ([[User talk:Kurushiyama|talk]]) 10:53, 8 October 2016 (UTC) | ||
I have read that using a journalling fs is not a good idea for SD cards as it shortens their life by multiplying the read/writes. Wouldn't ext2 thus be a better fs for persistent overlays? -- [[User:Nevarmaor|Nevarmaor]] ([[User talk:Nevarmaor|talk]]) 21:56, 20 February 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:57, 20 February 2017
Persistence
Wouldn't it be more reasonable to partition the SD-Card accordingly? That way, you could have FS > 2GB, too. --Kurushiyama (talk) 10:53, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
I have read that using a journalling fs is not a good idea for SD cards as it shortens their life by multiplying the read/writes. Wouldn't ext2 thus be a better fs for persistent overlays? -- Nevarmaor (talk) 21:56, 20 February 2017 (UTC)