Talk:Raspberry Pi: Difference between revisions

From Alpine Linux
m (→‎Persistence: removed leading space)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
== Persistence ==
== Persistence ==
Wouldn't it be more reasonable to partition the SD-Card accordingly? That way, you could have FS > 2GB, too. --[[User:Kurushiyama|Kurushiyama]] ([[User talk:Kurushiyama|talk]]) 10:53, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
Wouldn't it be more reasonable to partition the SD-Card accordingly? That way, you could have FS > 2GB, too. --[[User:Kurushiyama|Kurushiyama]] ([[User talk:Kurushiyama|talk]]) 10:53, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
I have read that using a journalling fs is not a good idea for SD cards as it shortens their life by multiplying the read/writes. Wouldn't ext2 thus be a better fs for persistent overlays? -- [[User:Nevarmaor|Nevarmaor]] ([[User talk:Nevarmaor|talk]]) 21:56, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:57, 20 February 2017

Persistence

Wouldn't it be more reasonable to partition the SD-Card accordingly? That way, you could have FS > 2GB, too. --Kurushiyama (talk) 10:53, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

I have read that using a journalling fs is not a good idea for SD cards as it shortens their life by multiplying the read/writes. Wouldn't ext2 thus be a better fs for persistent overlays? -- Nevarmaor (talk) 21:56, 20 February 2017 (UTC)