Difference between revisions of "Talk:Python package policies"

From Alpine Linux
Jump to: navigation, search
(Note discussion from IRC)
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
`_py2_depends` and `_py3_depends` are more consistent with the other variable names and preferable to '_py2_deps' and '_py3_deps' in my opinion.
 
`_py2_depends` and `_py3_depends` are more consistent with the other variable names and preferable to '_py2_deps' and '_py3_deps' in my opinion.
 +
 +
Agreed, but I've removed all of the Python 2 details entirely pending the coming EoL.
 +
--[[User:Ddevault|Ddevault]] ([[User talk:Ddevault|talk]]) 15:10, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
  
  
Line 14: Line 17:
  
 
_pyname is much less common than _pkgname although _pkgname is used for many things; would be good to have a clear recommended name
 
_pyname is much less common than _pkgname although _pkgname is used for many things; would be good to have a clear recommended name
 +
 +
_pyname was per ncopa's suggestion, I don't have a problem with it.
 +
--[[User:Ddevault|Ddevault]] ([[User talk:Ddevault|talk]]) 15:10, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:10, 24 January 2020

This page duplicates quite a bit of details which are already present:

Instead of creating a new page the existing information should be updated.


`_py2_depends` and `_py3_depends` are more consistent with the other variable names and preferable to '_py2_deps' and '_py3_deps' in my opinion.

Agreed, but I've removed all of the Python 2 details entirely pending the coming EoL. --Ddevault (talk) 15:10, 24 January 2020 (UTC)



_pyname is much less common than _pkgname although _pkgname is used for many things; would be good to have a clear recommended name

_pyname was per ncopa's suggestion, I don't have a problem with it. --Ddevault (talk) 15:10, 24 January 2020 (UTC)