Talk:Using Unbound as an Ad-blocker - Revision history

Nangel: Done.

2024-02-16T03:47:27Z

Done.

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:47, 16 February 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~==Proposal to remove entire background section==~~
	I think that the background section adds NOTHING to this article. The article is about unbound, but the entire background section seems to refer to pi-hole... It's funny because the article title doesn't mention pi-hole at all. Unbound is a perfectly functional way to add advertising blocking without any of the pi-hole nonsense.

	~~I propose that the background section either be completely removed, or at least stripped of ridiculous formatting and references to pi-hole.~~
	–[[User:zcrayfish\|zcrayfish]] <small>([[User talk:zcrayfish\|talk]]•[[Special:Contributions/zcrayfish\|contribs]]•[[Special:EmailUser/zcrayfish\|send email]])</small> 06:32, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

	==Mention of modern browsers' attempts to bypass DNS blocking of ad servers==		==Mention of modern browsers' attempts to bypass DNS blocking of ad servers==
	The article could also use an entire section explaining how modern browsers, especially Chrome, attempt to use DNS over HTTPS to bypass the system configured DNS server under the guise of privacy (but lets face it, Google has financial incentive to prevent people from blocking ad.doubleclick.com)... An unbound configuration that prevents bootstrapping of popular DoH servers could help. Something like:		The article could also use an entire section explaining how modern browsers, especially Chrome, attempt to use DNS over HTTPS to bypass the system configured DNS server under the guise of privacy (but lets face it, Google has financial incentive to prevent people from blocking ad.doubleclick.com)... An unbound configuration that prevents bootstrapping of popular DoH servers could help. Something like:

Zcrayfish: Added a suggestion that includes a massive codeblock. Not sure how to work it in the article.

2024-02-15T06:51:20Z

Added a suggestion that includes a massive codeblock. Not sure how to work it in the article.

Show changes

Zcrayfish: Created page with "==Proposal to remove entire background section== I think that the background section adds NOTHING to this article. The article is about unbound, but the entire background section seems to refer to pi-hole... It's funny because the article title doesn't mention pi-hole at all. Unbound is a perfectly functional way to add advertising blocking without any of the pi-hole nonsense. I propose that the background section either be completely removed, or at least stripped of r..."

2024-02-15T06:32:19Z

Created page with "==Proposal to remove entire background section== I think that the background section adds NOTHING to this article. The article is about unbound, but the entire background section seems to refer to pi-hole... It's funny because the article title doesn't mention pi-hole at all. Unbound is a perfectly functional way to add advertising blocking without any of the pi-hole nonsense. I propose that the background section either be completely removed, or at least stripped of r..."

New page

==Proposal to remove entire background section==
I think that the background section adds NOTHING to this article. The article is about unbound, but the entire background section seems to refer to pi-hole... It's funny because the article title doesn't mention pi-hole at all. Unbound is a perfectly functional way to add advertising blocking without any of the pi-hole nonsense.

I propose that the background section either be completely removed, or at least stripped of ridiculous formatting and references to pi-hole.
–[[User:zcrayfish|zcrayfish]] <small>([[User talk:zcrayfish|talk]]•[[Special:Contributions/zcrayfish|contribs]]•[[Special:EmailUser/zcrayfish|send email]])</small> 06:32, 15 February 2024 (UTC)